Hiring Rights

Hiring Rights

“Hiring rights” refers to the all-important right of a church or other religious employer to employ those who serve its mission. Christian Legal Society believes all persons have the inherent dignity of being made in God’s image. In addition, Scripture teaches that God chooses to work through His people, fallible but filled with His Holy Spirit. Conversely, those with different beliefs are entitled to hold them but are not entitled to work for the religious employer, including churches, who seeks staff and volunteers who share the same convictions and mission as the religious employer.

The same logic and law support the right of religious employers to hold their staff to religion-based standards of conduct. Churches are not looking for perfect employees, just those who not only affirm the creed and also agree to try to follow in their personal lives the conduct standards they aspire to. The claims of Christ apply to the totality of one’s life, not just where one goes on a Sunday morning. It colors one’s understanding of right and wrong, including marriage and sexual identity. It animates concern for the impoverished, the unhoused, refugees, orphans, and those with disabilities. Again, everyone can believe and behave differently, but the religious employer may seek those who share its beliefs and try to live them.

Hiring rights are at the forefront of the struggle for religious freedom in the United States today. May a Roman Catholic school hire only believers as math teachers? May a church denominational headquarters require that all their employees be church members in good standing? May a faith-based foster care agency require that its social workers be Christian? May a religious relief and development agency require that its employees try to abide by its religious standards, including those on heterosexual marriage? May a Christian shelter for the unhoused hire only those who have a faith they can share personally with the homeless clients?

The bedrock of religious hiring rights is, of course, the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Applying to a church a law against discriminating in employment imposes not only a substantial burden on its free exercise of religion, but also on its autonomy, its free speech, and its right of association. Federal legislation also protects the employment rights of religious persons (e.g., Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 or “RFRA”). State RFRAs and state constitutions also may guarantee these rights.

In a sense, an organization’s mission integrity is completely dependent on its leaders, employees, and volunteers; it is only as strong as its weakest link. That explains why it is only common sense that an abortion clinic may decline to hire a pro-life nurse who regularly volunteers on her time off as a sidewalk counselor in front of clinics. Similarly, if a religious organization believes that the indwelling of the Spirit of Jesus in all its staff is vital to the success of the organization as a whole, then the organization should be able to select those who share the faith and seek to live accordingly. The day that this becomes no longer true would be the day that the organized Body of Christ either goes underground or becomes ineffective.

The Center’s Work
Protecting Hiring Rights

The Center and a Michigan law firm represent Bethany Christian Services in its lawsuit filed against the state of Michigan after the state denied Bethany refugee-resettlement services contracts because of their religious employment practices, even though federal law has long supported this civil right. Bethany Christian Services has been a contractor of the state of Michigan, providing refugee-resettlement services there since 1981. In 2023, state officials in its Office of Global Michigan (OGM) took issue with Bethany’s practice of requiring its employees to affirm the organization’s statement of faith and denied Bethany refugee-resettlement services contracts because of its religious employment practices. Bethany sued the state of Michigan for discriminating against Bethany because of its religious hiring practices.

The ministerial exception bars courts from reviewing employment decisions made by religious schools regarding “ministers,” shielding the schools from discrimination lawsuits—such as Title VII, age, or disability claims—if the teacher or employee plays a key role in teaching faith, leading prayer, or transmitting religious doctrine. It is a legal principle derived from the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause, which bars government interference in religion. It also follows from the Establishment Clause, which forbids government to select religious leaders or set the criteria for their selection. The exception applies based on an employee’s job functions, not their title or ordination status. Lay teachers who teach religion, pray with students, or attend Mass with them often qualify.

The Center has supported the hiring rights of religious schools by filing amicus briefs in numerous cases, including Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru and St. James School v. Biel, Billard v. Charlotte Catholic High School, and Starkey v. Archdiocese of Indianapolis.

World Vision is a Christian humanitarian organization dedicated to helping children, families, and communities overcome extreme poverty and injustice. World Vision, which requires its  employees to affirm the Christian faith and agree to abide by Christian standards of conduct, revoked a job offer it had made to Aubry McMahon to be a remote customer service representative after learning that McMahon was married to a same-sex partner. McMahon sued for discrimination based on sex, sexual orientation, and marital status under Title VII and Washington state law. The district court initially granted summary judgment to World Vision before reversing itself and granting summary judgment to McMahon. The Center filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in McMahon v. World Vision supporting World Vision’s right to enforce Christian conduct standards for its employees. On appeal, the Ninth Circuit reversed the district court’s decision and ruled that the ministerial exception, which allows an employer a significant amount of freedom in employment decisions as to employees who qualify as “ministers” (which definition is not limited to ordained individuals), bars McMahon’s employment discrimination claims because World Vision’s customer service representatives perform key religious functions central to World Vision’s mission, including engaging with donors in prayer.

Church autonomy is the constitutional principle derived from the First Amendment’s Religion Clauses that protects religious organizations from government interference in their internal governance, doctrine, and personnel decisions. The church autonomy doctrine forbids courts from meddling with the internal governance of religious organizations, including faith-based organizations, and with hiring decisions involving non-ministerial employees. It ensures churches and religious organizations are free to manage their own affairs without civil court oversight.

The Center has filed amicus briefs in support of the hiring rights of religious organizations, including in Union Gospel Mission of Yakima v. Brown, Youth 71Five v. Williams, and General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists v. Horton.

What You Can Do

  1. Are you facing a current or potential legal issue related to hiring and need help? If so, please fill out our legal intake form, and we will review.

2. Support the work of the Center with a donation and adding us to your church mission budget. We represent the clients we take at no cost and do a lot of pro bono consultation in addition to our robust amicus brief work. We are grateful for every bit of support.

3. Sign up for The Center Docket, which is the Center’s monthly newsletter.

4. Monitor what your state governor and state legislature are considering in this area and alert the Center by emailing us at clrf@clsnet.org.

Do You Need Help?

Christian Legal Society offers legal assistance for those in need through CLS’ network of Christian Legal Aid clinics and Christian Attorneys’ directory. CLS’ Center for Law & Religious Freedom is also available to address issues related to the infringement of religious freedom.

Find a Christian Attorney
Get Help with Religious Freedom
Find a Christian Legal Aid Clinic