ABA Model Rule 8.4(g)
ABA Model Rule 8.4(g):
A Misguided Proposed Ethics Rule Change
Additionally, Center Director Kim Colby wrote a memorandum discussing the pitfalls of ABA Model Rule 8.4(g).
CLS' Nationwide Efforts Fighting ABA Model Rule 8.4(g)
Shortly after the ABA adopted Model Rule 8.4(g), the ABA sent a letter to every state supreme court asking it to also adopt ABA Model Rule 8.4(g). The model rule, therefore, is on the radar of every state supreme court and is, in that sense, “under consideration.”
Each state may determine for itself whether to adopt ABA Model Rule 8.4(g). The ABA claims that twenty-four states already have a black-letter rule like ABA Model Rule 8.4(g), but that claim is not accurate. Twenty-four states have a rule that addresses "bias" in some way, but no state, except Vermont, has a rule as overly broad in scope as ABA Model Rule 8.4(g). Thirteen states have a more restricted comment rather than a black-letter rule. The remaining fourteen states have neither a comment nor a black-letter rule.
Some states have already publicly proposed adoption of ABA Model Rule 8.4(g). CLS has filed a comment letter opposing adoption of ABA Model Rule 8.4(g) in every state in which CLS was aware of an open comment period. Read CLS Executive Director David Nammo’s comment letters (listed in order of most recently submitted):
- Illinois comment letter (October 2023)
- Nebraska comment letter
- Wisconsin comment letter
- Utah supplemental comment letter (December 2020)
- Alaska supplemental comment letter (December 2020)
- Hawai'i comment letter
- Alaska comment letter (August 2020)
- Utah comment letter (July 2020)
- South Dakota comment letter
- Pennsylvania comment letter (September 2019)
- Iowa comment letter
- Alaska comment letter (July 2019)
- New Hampshire comment letter (May 2019)
- Utah comment letter (May 2019)
- New Hampshire comment letter (April 2019)
- District of Columbia comment letter
- Utah supplemental comment letter (August 2018)
- Pennsylvania comment letter (July 2018)
- Maine comment letter
- New Hampshire comment letter (May 2018)
- Arizona comment letter
- Idaho comment letter
- Tennessee comment letter
- Louisiana comment letter
- Utah comment letter (July 2017)
- Nevada comment letter
- South Carolina comment letter
- Pennsylvania comment letter (February 2017)
- Illinois comment letter (January 2017)
- Montana comment letter
- California comment letter
Work needs to be done in all 50 states, regardless of whether a new rule has been publicly proposed there or not. Some state bars or state supreme courts want to push ABA Model Rule 8.4(g), and CLS wants to help individuals in the states educate their state bars and state courts as to the immense problems posed by ABA Model Rule 8.4(g).
CLS has attorney members in almost all states and the District of Columbia. In several states, concerned attorneys have already succeeded in educating their peers as to the reasons why ABA Model Rule 8.4(g) should not be adopted in their state. Listed to the right are the states where CLS knows that there has been some talk or consideration of ABA Model Rule 8.4(g).