Sanctity of Human Life

Defending the Sanctity of Human Life

The sanctity of human life is rooted in the imago Dei—the truth taught by the Bible that all individuals are created in the image of God, granting them inherent value and dignity from conception to natural death.

Based on this religious conviction, CLS and its Center for Law & Religious Freedom believe that human life is inherently valuable and sacred, deserving of respect, justice, and protection, and that human life—as a gift from its Creator—is holy, precious, and should be treated with reverence.

The Center defends the sanctity of human life in many ways, including opposing abortion, protecting the conscience of those who object to performing or having their health plans cover abortion, supporting adoption and foster care, opposing physician-assisted suicide, supporting ministry to single mothers (including defending crisis pregnancy centers against intimidation by aggressive state attorneys general), and fighting against human trafficking. The Center has filed amicus briefs in numerous life-related cases including Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health, the case that overruled both Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey. The Center supports legislation that will empower and protect women and children and promote life, such as more affordable and accessible childcare, stronger and more equitable child support enforcement, and improved adoption and foster care systems, and opposes legislation creating an affirmative right to chemical abortion.

The Center’s Work
Defending Life

CLS filed an amicus brief in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health urging the Court to overrule Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Written by Judge Ken Starr and the Robertson Center for Constitutional Law at Regent University, the brief argues that federalism has long protected liberty and sustained our pluralistic society, but open-ended conceptions of substantive due process undermine the fundamental principles of federalism.

Abortion jurisprudence provides a singular example of the harms that result when courts sever our history and traditions from substantive due process analysis. Nor can the Court serve the rule of law by preserving precedents that subvert the rule of law and erode democratic discourse.

CLS joined a coalition letter to U.S. Senators requesting they reject the nomination of Dr. Robert Califf for FDA Commissioner.

The letter highlights the following: (1) Califf’s role in the FDA’s 2016 decision to remove critical chemical abortion reporting requirements; (2) how the Califf-approved FDA reporting changes have recklessly undermined data on chemical abortion complications and obscured the true risks of the drug; and (3) exhaustive studies demonstrating the data that the FDA has chosen to use to assess the risk of mail-order abortion is “woefully inadequate.”

In May 2024, CLS joined a number of pro-life organizations in opposing S. 1999, the Right to Contraceptives Act, a bill intended to codify the legal right to obtain and provide contraception. In addition, CLS separately wrote to a number of senators asking them to vote against cloture on the bill specifically because it contained a carveout of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (“RFRA”), which is the primary federal safeguard of all Americans’ religious freedom. Thankfully, Senate Republicans blocked action on the legislation when all but two Republicans present voted against advancing the legislation. Democrats, who unanimously supported it, were left nine votes short of the 60 they would need to take up the bill.

Senators James Lankford (R-OK) and Jim Banks (R-IN) reintroduced the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act on January 15, 2025. This bill establishes requirements for the degree of care a health care practitioner must provide in the case of a child born alive following an abortion or attempted abortion. Specifically, a health care practitioner who is present must (1) exercise the same degree of care as would reasonably be provided to any other child born alive at the same gestational age, and (2) ensure the child is immediately admitted to a hospital. The bill also provides that an individual who intentionally kills or attempts to kill a child born alive is subject to prosecution for murder. CLS was among a group of pro-life organizations that supported the bill.

In 2026, Rep. Chris Smith (R-NJ), Rep. Claudia Tenney (R-NY), and Michelle Fischbach (R-MN) introduced the Let Pregnancy Centers Serve Act of 2025, H.R. 2226, which will prohibit federal, state and local governments from discriminating against pregnancy care centers because of their life-affirming viewpoint and mission. Despite the important work of pregnancy care centers, there are many states working to censor, intimidate, or even close them. For instance, pregnancy centers in New Jersey and Washington were forced to defend themselves by filing lawsuits after being alleged targeted by their respective state attorneys general. The Let Pregnancy Centers Serve Act ensures pregnancy resource centers and pro-life centers are not discriminated against and are able to carry out their services, including providing emotional support, access to prenatal and pregnancy care, and supplies to expecting mothers. CLS joined other pro-life organizations in support of this important legislation.

What You Can Do

  1. Are you facing a current or potential legal issue related to the sanctity of human life and need help? If so, please fill out our legal intake form, and we will review.

2. Support the work of the Center with a donation and adding us to your church mission budget. We represent the clients we take at no cost and do a lot of pro bono consultation in addition to our robust amicus brief work. We are grateful for every bit of support.

3. Sign up for The Center Docket, which is the Center’s monthly newsletter.

4. Monitor what your state governor and state legislature are considering in this area and email the Center at clrf@clsnet.org.

CLS Publications on Life

Do You Need Help?

Christian Legal Society offers legal assistance for those in need through CLS’ network of Christian Legal Aid clinics and Christian Attorneys’ directory. CLS’ Center for Law & Religious Freedom is also available to address issues related to the infringement of religious freedom.

Find a Christian Attorney
Get Help with Religious Freedom
Find a Christian Legal Aid Clinic